首页> 外文OA文献 >Perioperative nerve blockade: clues from the bench.
【2h】

Perioperative nerve blockade: clues from the bench.

机译:围手术期神经阻滞:从替补席上获得线索。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Peripheral and neuraxial nerve blockades are widely used in the perioperative period. Their values to diminish acute postoperative pain are established but other important outcomes such as chronic postoperative pain, or newly, cancer recurrence, or infections could also be influenced. The long-term effects of perioperative nerve blockade are still controversial. We will review current knowledge of the effects of blocking peripheral electrical activity in different animal models of pain. We will first go over the mechanisms of pain development and evaluate which types of fibers are activated after an injury. In the light of experimental results, we will propose some hypotheses explaining the mitigated results obtained in clinical studies on chronic postoperative pain. Finally, we will discuss three major disadvantages of the current blockade: the absence of blockade of myelinated fibers, the inappropriate duration of blockade, and the existence of activity-independent mechanisms.
机译:围手术期广泛使用神经周围神经阻滞。已经确立了它们减轻急性术后疼痛的价值,但其他重要结果,例如慢性术后疼痛,或新近出现的癌症复发或感染也可能受到影响。围手术期神经阻滞的长期效果仍存在争议。我们将回顾在不同的动物疼痛模型中阻断外周电活动影响的当前知识。我们将首先探讨疼痛发展的机制,并评估受伤后激活的纤维类型。根据实验结果,我们将提出一些假设,以解释在慢性术后疼痛的临床研究中获得的缓解结果。最后,我们将讨论当前封锁的三个主要弊端:没有髓鞘纤维的封锁,不适当的封锁持续时间以及与活动无关的机制的存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号